The work

When COVID-19 arrived with a wave of false and misleading information, one of the first problems was that the field could not agree on what the words even meant. Dr Darrin Baines's work set out to fix that, defining and separating misinformation, disinformation and malinformation, and giving researchers and policymakers clear language to measure and respond to the infodemic.

Key publications

2020

University of Birmingham Discussion Papers

Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic most cited

Baines D, Elliott RJR

View on OpenAlex
2020

Infodemic now: how do we know when the news is fake?

Baines D

The impact

Over 200 citations

Over 200 citations on Google Scholar, 85 indexed on OpenAlex, and counting. His definitional work is cited internationally, across public health and information science, by researchers building directly on it.

Researchers who cite this definitional paper include

Yogesh K. Dwivedi

Swansea University, in the International Journal of Information Management

Malik Sallam

University of Jordan, in PLOS ONE

Mariusz Duplaga

Jagiellonian University, Krakow, in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Shubhangi Rastogi

Punjab Engineering College, in the International Journal of Information Security

Naresh Kumar Agarwal

Simmons University, Boston, in the Aslib Journal of Information Management

Why this is authority

This standing does not rest on a title. It rests on work that other researchers use and build on, in their own published studies, around the world. That is a genuine, verifiable form of expertise, recognised by peers, and it is machine-readable, so search engines and AI can check it directly.

Publications resolve through ORCID 0000-0001-9502-4678. Topic identifiers: misinformation (Wikidata Q13579947), disinformation (Q189656), infodemic (Q94438711). Part of the Dr Darrin Baines authority record.